FREE TO READ

Everything here is free to read, and nothing here is a claim about your case. Built from California’s published records and modified by us — not official government data. How these numbers were made.

Treatment class · category · California

Mental Health denials at external review

When a California health plan denied care in the mental health class and the enrollee took it to Independent Medical Review, this is what independent physician reviewers decided.

79.8%

Overturned
1,243 of 1,558
Era
2021-2025
Jurisdiction
California DMHC IMR
Published class
Mental Health
Median days to decision
27
All years
59.0% of 4,815
1,243 overturned315 upheld

What stands out here

computed from this class
  • among the highest

    At 79.8%, this is the 2nd highest overturn rate of the 22 treatment classes with enough decisions to publish one. Reviewers sustained the plan in the remaining 20.2% of disputes.

  • rising

    It has risen over the published record: 48.7% in 2003 against 87.9% in 2025. What drove that is not in this data — the file holds outcomes, not who chose to appeal or how plans changed their own review.

  • most-cited standard

    Reviewers named LOCUS family more than any other standard here — 808 decisions, which came out at 82.1%. Citing a standard and the outcome share a cause; this is not the effect of naming it.

  • concentrated

    96% of these disputes involved mental health alone (n=1,502, 79.8% overturned), so the headline figure for mental health is largely that pairing.

The trend, with its era

computed
0%25%50%75%100%SB 1410 field mandate87.9%200320052010201520202025Share of decisions overturning the health plan · years below n=30 omitted

Hover the chart for a year’s counts. Series stops at 2025 — report year 2026 uses a different category vocabulary.

What reviewers relied on

3 validated codes

California requires each published decision to carry “a detailed case summary that includes the specific standards, criteria, and medical and scientific evidence, if any, that led to the case decision” (Health & Safety Code § 1374.33(h)(1)(K)). These are the elements our extraction found in this class, split by how the decision came out.

What the reviewer relied onIn overturnsIn upholds
the FDA label or approval status1%n=1,2430%n=315
a standardised level-of-care instrument93%n=1,24385%n=315
a California statutory definition4%n=1,2438%n=315

Read as description, not instruction. These are patterns in what reviewers wrote, not steps to follow, and no combination of them predicts an outcome. Only codes that cleared the validation gate appear — thirteen did not.

Authorities named in this class

computed
  • LOCUS family82.1%808
  • American Society of Addiction Medicine79.3%584
  • American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry78.0%305
  • FDA15
  • American Psychiatric Association10

A rate here is the outcome of decisions that named the authority, not the effect of naming it. Reviewers cite the standard they applied; the citation and the outcome share a cause.

By condition

computed
  • Overturned — the reviewer did not sustain the denial
  • Upheld — the reviewer sustained the denial
  • Mental health79.8%1,502
  • Autism spectrum78.7%47
  • CNS & neuromuscular3
  • Cardiac & circulatory1
  • Endocrine & metabolic1
  • Genitourinary & kidney1
  • Infectious disease1
  • Pediatrics1

Browse all condition classes · Pick your own pair

The specific conditions inside this class

below n=30, no rate is claimed
  • Depression79.2%403
  • Substance Use Disorder82.5%365
  • Alcohol Use Disorder80.0%185
  • Anxiety73.9%157
  • Bipolar Disorder82.6%86
  • PTSD80.3%61
  • Eating Disorder88.2%51
  • ADHD72.0%50

By review type

computed
  • Medical Necessity80.1%1,547
  • Experimental/Investigational9
  • Urgent Care2

Medical-necessity review asks whether the care is needed. Experimental/investigational review asks whether it is likely to be more beneficial than standard therapy — a harder statutory test, and the rates show it.

Every figure on this page is conditional on a denial having reached external review. Fewer than 1% of denials are appealed internally at all, so this describes denials that were fought to the end — not denials in general — and it describes California only. Who this does not cover.

Free help, first: the California DMHC Help Center files your Independent Medical Review at no cost — 1-888-466-2219, dmhc.ca.gov.